The correct answer is C) They would be angry because such development would severely limit their only access to freshwater in the region.
<em>If Turkey were to build twenty more dams on these rivers, this most likely affects Syria and Iraq in that they would be angry because such development would severely limit their only access to freshwater in the region. </em>
Turkey, Syria, and Iraq have been faced with water problems since many years ago. Water is a scarce resource in the Middle East due to desert conditions and is a big issue for these countries. Syria, Turkey, and Iraq have not reached an agreement on a water settlement over the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates because Syria and Turkey have built dams to generate electricity and store water, and this reduces the water supply in Iraq. So the real thing is that each country has its own interests and agendas and neither of them has considered the other nation's necessities in order to reach a fair agreement for the three of them.
Answer:
I would say its C
Explanation
Bush said America has, and intends to keep, military strengths beyond
challenge. so i think it would be C
The historical accuracy of Forrest Gump persists throughout the movie, even involving itself in the intricacies of each event. For example, the audience assumes from the movie that Forrest was responsible for creating the smiley face during his cross country run in the 70's.
Answer: A
Explanation: Just like the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the nation of Yugoslavia collapsed due to different groups of individuals wanting there individual freedom.
Answer:
C. can take the case to a higher court.
Explanation:
An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).
Hence, a person who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision can take the case to a higher court. This simply means that, when a person loses a court case decided by an appellate court, trial court or other lower courts (tribunal); he or she has the fundamental or basic rights to appeal the verdict in a federal appellate court of competent jurisdiction or even the supreme court.
