Well I can't see the possible sentences, but muslims were a minority in India at the time and the population was predominantly Hindu. Forcing the majority of the population to change their religion forcibly (and through that many of their core values, beliefs, traditions and practices) was a quick way to create political unrest which could lead to a revolution. They we're already a minority ruling a large and powerful nation, so they were already dealing with a lot of resistance from the population as it was. Maybe they wanted to practice tolerance for moral reasons, but more likely they just didn't want to push their luck when they were already struggling to remain popular.
Answer:
Reasons for Britain's Victory
Collaboration with colonial authorities: Pitt gave local authorities control over supplies and recruitment, paying them for their help, while the French struggled to get manpower and supplies. The French were however better at recruiting the Indians to fight with them. A better navy.
Explanation:
The U.S. President Trump, after the past few presidents have been holding this off, Has finally made the decision and signed the waiver making the decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Though they already could make this decision long ago, every six months, the past presidents kept holding it off. There is more to it, but the simple answer is Jerusalem. However your question does not seem legit... why do you ask this?
