Answer: B
Jerome is ethical because he cited his sources and used them to develop his own slant on the topic.
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the act of taking the work of an individual, using them and passing them off as one's work. Emerson was ethical as she did not copy the works of another source word for word, in fact she blended it with her own wordings and where she couldn't find add her own perspective she paraphrased and sited the source in her speech.
The process of identifying word roots has more to do with stripping away additional word elements than directly locating the root.
For example, if you had the word "hardly" you'd strip away the suffix "ly" and have the root remaining, "hard".
Hope that helps!
<span>Words of the same root with different affixes are well
thought-out different words, so in that regard it would follow that there would
be more words. But if you mean there might be a capability to change an
existing word simply and clearly put off or negate people inventing entirely
new words, root and all? In that circumstance, especially considering each
modification of a root is in theory a separate word, there would be no much
impact; all words have to start from somewhere.</span>
Is there answer choices or is this an essay question? Ima help you and give you the rough answer as an essay question for now:
The lamb makes sense when referring to songs of innocence because lambs are referenced as pure creatures untouched by evil and pain and suffering. They are considered innocent basically.
Answer:
Hey kid, i hate to break it to u but im waiting for an answer too
Explanation:
ill tell u when i get right
