Answer:
maybe they are historians
Answer:
It hinders people from analyzing past events or history objectively
Explanation:
The effect of the “cancel culture" actions on History is that "It hinders people from analyzing past events or history objectively."
This is because Cancel culture is a term that describes the situation in which people who have a differing opinion often seen as offensive are excluded from public space or exterminated such that their career or public image are dented.
Such negative repercussions of cancel culture tend to "hinders people from analyzing past events or history objectively, " as people would be afraid to talk objectively.
Answer:
There were more weaknesses than strengths under the Articles of Confederation. The lack of power given to the Continental Congress strangled the federal government. The Articles gave Congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws
Explanation:
<span>A good side of the short term is that those who
are representing will have more focus on the work they are responsible for and
will not lose motivation. Another aspect I that with the shorter term more
people will have the opportunity to participate in administration bringing out
new ideas and innovations competing and trying to show the best in the time. A
negative side is that sometime someone can commit mistake which they want to
rectify but cannot due to short term which can be a plus point for long term. </span>
Around 16th century’s end, Spain was composed of African slave labor and Indian forced wage labor as they capitalized on these practices like what France and the Netherlands did. Spain’s image of being a exploiting and harsh colonizer was spread by the Black Legend and due to this image, it was used as a justification by different European authorities to try and overcome the predominance of Spain in America.
