Answer:
In a year that seemed determined to shake Americans’ confidence in the foundations of their society, Kennedy’s death at 1:44 a.m. Pacific time on June 6, 25 hours after he was shot, was one of the biggest inflection points. Sirhan Sirhan’s bullets not only demolished the hope for a savior candidate who would unite a party so fractured that its incumbent, President Lyndon B. Johnson, had decided not to seek re-election. Coming just two months after the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., they also fueled a general sense — not entirely unfamiliar today — that the nation had gone mad; that the normal rules and constants of politics could no longer be counted on.
Latin America was all motivated by an interest in acquiring new markets and sources of raw materials.
<h3>
What policy did the US take toward China?</h3>
The United States and China inked a bilateral trade deal and restored diplomatic ties in 1979. As a result, trade between the two countries grew quickly, from $4 billion (exports and imports) in that year to nearly $600 billion in 2017.
Thus, the annexation of Hawaii, the open door policy with china, and the construction of the Panama canal in Latin America were all motivated by an interest in acquiring new markets and sources of raw materials.
Learn more about US policy here:
brainly.com/question/14032183
#SPJ1
It represented social Darwinism, so it would be the first choice.
Thanks to discrimination after the GI Bill of Rights was passed:
- Many were denied loans to purchase a home from white loan officers.
- Many were denied high-paying jobs due to lack of education.
- Many were denied entry into colleges due to segregation laws.
The GI Bill of Rights was passed after the second World War in order to help veterans be integrated into society. It was to help them get houses through housing assistance and education through tuition assistance.
Because Black people were mostly denied entry into colleges due to segregation laws, they could not take advantage of the bill to get better education that would guarantee them better jobs.
They were also denied loan applications to get houses by white loan officers and so could not benefit from that as well.
In conclusion, the GI Bill of Rights did not benefit every veteran but only those with a certain skin tone.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/21158624. </em>
