Answer:
The difference between two securities is 0.89%.
Explanation:
Inflation premium for the next three and five years:
Inflation premium (3) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85%) ÷ 3
= 2.83%
Inflation premium (5) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85% + 3.85% + 3.85%) ÷ 5
= 3.24%
Real risk-free rate = 2.35%
Since default premium and liquidity premium are zero on treasury bonds, we can now solve for the maturity risk premium:
Three-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (3) + MRP(3)
6.80% = 2.35% + 2.83% + MRP(3)
MRP (3) = 1.62%
Similarly,
5-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (5) + MRP(5)
8.10% = 2.35% + 3.24% + MRP(3)
MRP (5) = 2.51%
Thus,
MRP5 - MRP3 = 2.51% - 1.62%
= 0.89%
Therefore, the difference between two securities is 0.89%.
When interest rates on treasury bills and other financial assets are low, the opportunity cost of holding money is <u>low </u>so the quantity of money demanded will be <u>high</u>.
If interest rates go up, the demand for money will go down. Once it equals the new money supply, there will be no more difference between how much money people are holding and how much they want to keep, and the story is over. This is why (and how) a decline in the money supply raises interest rates.
As interest rates rise, the amount of money demanded decreases because the opportunity cost of holding money decreases. As interest rates rise, aggregate demand shifts to the left. The interest rate effect arises from the idea that higher price levels reduce the real value of household holdings.
Learn more about interest rates here: brainly.com/question/1115815
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. May not be able to afford, but nevertheless admire, global brands.
Explanation:
Let's analize all the statements for separate.
A.Global dreamers favour the global brands. Unlike global citizens can't afford them, but still admire them.
B. Refers to Antiglobals
C. Refers to global agnostics
D. Is against some global brands, can be seen as soft global agnostic.
Answer: The answer is provided below
Explanation:
a. When the quantity supplied of a particular crop reduces, it will affect the farmer's revenue but this can still be beneficial to the farmer provided these conditions prevails:
• If demand for the crop rises more than its fall in supply, this will lead to a rise in the and price of the crop. Hence, there will also be an increase in the revenue of the farmer and the farmer will try to adjust output and sell at higher prices. Therefore, the excess demand can off set a fall in the supply.
b. We know that the supply of a crop is limited. For example, let's assume that the crop is rice. Now the situation is that people are demanding more beans maybe as a result of festive season. Therefore, everyone will want to purchase rice which will lead to an increase in the price of rice due to excess demand.
The farmer will try as much as possible to maximise profit and will therefore sell the rice at higher price to those that wants to buy. Therefore, it's clear that the farmer can still benefit, even if his supply is limited, but the demand must be greater than its decline in supply.
Answer:
$354
Explanation:
The computation of the weighted average contribution margin is shown below:
= (Contribution margin per unit for Model ABC × Sales mix for model ABC) + (Contribution margin per unit for Model XYZ × Sales mix for model XYZ) ÷ (Sales mix for model ABC + Sales mix for model XYZ)
= ($240 × 2 models + $430 × 3 models) ÷ (2 models + 3 models)
= ($480 + $1,290) ÷ (5 models)
= $354
We simply applied the above formula
