The stakeholders Neil A. discusses in his<em> "What I Learned About Being a Black Scientist" </em>column are readers, his students, his senior faculty members, and their employers.
The implicit and explicit views they have about the writer's skin color and his university career are relative to his image, which helps to reinforce the egalitarian and progressive values of academic departments.
Therefore, the author presents his views on these views in order to explain that academic departments wanted to hire a black face, but not a mind that discusses the issues suffered by black people such as racial, economic and gender inequality.
Find more information about racial inequality here:
brainly.com/question/71548
Answer:
Shall continue to
Explanation:
The author's claim is that students should have more recess time. That is the point he/she is trying to prove. "Without more recess time" means "if the students don't have more recess time." The answer is not 'will,' because the author is trying to prove that students are already struggling with their problems and won't get better unless they have more recess time. It is not 'might,' because that is still negative for their point that students should have more recess time to not struggle with their problems. It is 'shall continue to' because the author is proving that students are already struggling with problems and will continue to struggle without more recess time.
Answer:
Last week, we met several fascinating people at the conference.
Once upon a time, there was a beautiful princess who had lived in a castle.
I've owned this answer phone for three years.
They haven't sold all the tickets to the Cup Final.
Explanation:
Answer:
Thinking about your audience differently can improve your writing, especially in terms of how clearly you express your argument.
Explanation:
Magnifying object would be the answer to your question
