Answer:
There is one strong claim against it:
<em>Schools should not allow kids.... </em><em>distraction.</em>
Explanation:
Those who are not strong claims:
<em>In the latest survey... </em><em>kids said</em>
Anything that is based on what kids say can´t be a strong claim.
<em>Not every kid can have... because... </em><em>expensive</em><em>...</em><em> kids do not have jobs</em>
Apart from the fact that child labor is forbidden the economic reason for not allowing cell phones is not the issue. It is a social and educational issue.
And the other claim in favor has one word that makes it rather worthless:
<em>they are helpful tools and allow </em><em>people </em><em>...</em>
As we are talking about kids this claim misses the important point.
<em></em>
<em />
Answer:A
Explanation
It is being described in passage 2 that water saving machines are expensive and it is cheaper to pay fine than buying machines. Therefore, this statement conflicts the option A.
Answer: The answer is E- The reaper is bending and reaping crops
Explanation: I got it correct in my Edmentum test
