I think
D. <span>Once Constantine accepted Christianity, the Roman Empire became the center of the new faith's growth.
</span>
US: 40 degrees N
China: 30 degrees N
No, the freedom of speech is one of the most important rights in a democracy along with the freedom of press. It allows several voices to rise and be heard. But it does not means that you can say whatever you want whenever you want.
You can find the foundations of the freedom of speech in the first amendment where it says:
<em>"Amendment I
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Congress </em><em>shall make no law </em><em>respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or </em><em>abridging the freedom of speech</em><em>, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" </em>
But there are exceptions to the rule. You can´t say whatever you want as the supreme court have showed in several cases. From this we can extract some categories where the first amendment doesn´t work:
- Incitement: When its directed to inciting or producing inminent lawless action.
- False statements of facts: there are some types of this unprotected according to the supreme court: those said with <em>"sufficiently culpable mental state" </em>can be subject of criminal or civil liability. Secondly libel and slander and finally negligent statements or facts can be subject of civil liability.
As a conclusion we can say that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a healthy democracy but we must take care of it. We can´t say whatever we want, well actually we can but you have to be responsible of your acts.
Answer:
The felling is called <u>Nationalism</u>
Explanation:
Nationalism, in short, would be the feeling of belonging of a subject to a group either by proximity or by the racial, linguistic or historical bond. Thus, it is an ideology that exalts the national state to which the individual belongs rather than the image of what is foreign. Hitler however, raised this feeling to megalomania that scared the world.
He responded by saying that Galileo had no authority to determinan
which passages can or should be taken literally and which shouldn't
