Yes new zealand does have many hotels, ive been there
If Keynes's law applies during economic contractions and Say's law applies during economic expansion, the way in which the three goals of macroeconomics would be affected is that: trade-offs and connections may differ in the short run and the long run.
<h3>What is
macroeconomics?</h3>
Macroeconomics can be defined as a study of all the behaviors, performances, and factors that affect the entire economy. This ultimately implies that, macroeconomics typically focuses on aggregate phenomena such as the following:
- Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
- Inflation
- Price level
- Economic growth.
According to the law established by John Maynard Keynes, demand is an economic factor which creates its own supply. Additionally, the way in which the three (3) goals of macroeconomics would be affected are as follows:
- Trade-offs may differ in the short run.
- Connections may differ in the short run.
- Connections may differ in the long run.
- Trade-offs may differ in the long run.
Read more on macroeconomics here: brainly.com/question/29035217
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
If Keynes's law applies during economic contractions and Say's law applies during economic expansion, how will the three goals of macroeconomics be affected?
determinates of total supply for the economy will be traded-off
trade-offs and connections may differ in the short run and the long run
institutional and market structures will connect factors of production
the economy will face genuine limits to how much can be produced
Answer:
$111,991.59
Explanation:
using a loan calculator, I found the following information:
principal $150,000
apr 5.65%
360 monthly payments of $865.85
total payments $311,707.33
total interest charged on the loan $161,707.33
principal $150,000
apr 4%
180 monthly payments of $1,109.53
total payments $199,715.74
total interest charged on the loan $49,715.74
if you choose the 30 year mortgage, you will pay $161,707.33 - $49,715.74 = $111,991.59
Willy should buy(a) no insurance since the cost per dollar of insurance exceeds the probability of a flood
Explanation:
Willy's only source of wealth is his chocolate factory. He has the utility function p(cf)1/2 + (1 − p)(cnf)1/2,, where p is the probability of a flood, 1 - p is the probability of no flood, and cf and in are his wealth contingent on a flood and on no flood, respectively. <u>The probability of a flood is p = 1/6. </u>The value of Willy's factory is $500,000 if there is no flood and $0 if there is a flood. Willy can buy insurance where if he buys $x worth of insurance, he must pay the insurance company $2x/17 whether there is a flood or not but he gets back $x from the company if there is a flood. Willy should buy
The answer for the above statement is option ( A.) no insurance since the cost per dollar of insurance exceeds the probability of a flood .
It is because the probability of flood as given in the question is only 1/6, whereas the chances of no flood are 5/6. So that means that he should not buy the insurance because the probability of the flood is comparatively less than the amount Willy has to pay to the insurance company and the amount paid back to willy by the insurance company is $ x worth of insurance
A price increase may discourage customers from buying ice cream, or may choose a free cup over a cone.
