Answer: The exchange rate pass through is 41.7 = 6.666666667%÷16%
Explanation:
Currently, from last year to the current year, there has been a 16% increase change in the exchange rate and a 6.667% change in the price. The exchange rate pass through is 41.7 = 6.666666667%÷16%
For every increase in 1% of the exchange rate, there has been a 41.7% increase in the current price of the DVD player.
Answer:
A company comparison should not be made with industry averages if the company does not clearly fit into any one industry.
Explanation:
In Business management, it is important to note that many companies will not clearly fit into any one industry.
Hence, when using industry averages, it is often necessary to use an industry that the firm best fits rather than randomly picking up any industry. Additionally, the analysis of an organization's financial statements would be more meaningful if the results are compared with industry averages and with results of competitors.
Any financial service sought after, should use its best judgment by analyzing and identifying which industry the firm best fits.
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Total Segment Margin = Net Operating Income + common fixed expenses
= $ 25,000 + $ 37,000
= $ 62,000
Total Segment Margin = Segment Margin of Q + Segment Margin of P
$ 62,000 = $ 21,000 + Segment Margin of P
or Segment Margin of P = $ 62,000 - $ 21,000
= $ 41,000
Answer:
Average total cost= $46
Marginal revenue= $33
Explanation:
In this instance the monopolist's total cost is the revenue from sale of one unit less the economic profits per unit
Economic profit per unit= 2,700/900
Economic profit per unit= $3
Average total cost= (Price per unit) - (Economic profit per unit)
Average total cost= 49 - 3= $46
For this instance marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost.
Marginal revenue= Marginal cost= $39
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.