Answer:
Supermax
Explanation:
Supermax is a term used for those prisons which have the top criminals. Within the US territory, there is a federal maximum security prison located in Florence, Colorado where solitary confinement or "lockdown" is the treatment for those criminals.
The prisoners are isolated in a way that their location in a cell involves a very high level of security and prevents them from escaping or revolting.
There are further reasons for isolating for periods of 22 hours per day the inmates.
It is believed that effective and safe management of prison population<em> will be ensured and still some major organizations like Amnesty International criticize the "effectiveness of the model" since a Supermax is an extremely isolated environment where almost no human contact takes place.</em>
<u>The questioned method of treating humans in these conditions still is very debatable among punitory systems for their social implications.</u>
Answer:
The answer could be any, but I will say A.
Explanation:
During the primary elections, they want to appeal to voters who agree with the party's ideas. After that, in the general elections, they want to open up and sway the votes from the independent voters and even from other parties.
Answer:
Relevant; comparison
Explanation:
The comparison question test (CQT) posits that guilty individuals react more strongly to Relevant questions, whereas innocent individuals react more strongly to comparison questions.
The comparison question test (CQT) is one of the several questioning technique used in polygraph test, it designed to make comparative responses to relevant question with those of control questions i.e control for the effect of generally threatening nature of relevant question.
Making use of CQT assumes that physiological measures while lying will be greater than physiological measure while telling the truth. An innocent individual who is telling the truth react to comparison questions more than relevant question because these questions are design to arouse the subject concern about their past truthiness
The answer will be D because if there is a purpose behind an issue it can help provide examples and backup.
At least to me
Answer:
b. Being confirmed by the Senate
Explanation:
Regarding the selection process for all federal judges, Article II of the U.S. Constitution states the following:
<em>... and he </em><em>(The President) shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint</em><em> ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, </em><em>judges</em><em> </em><em>of the Supreme Court</em><em>, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law.</em>
Therefore, in order for a person to become a federal judge, they first have to be appointed by the President (who has to take into account the Senate's advice), and then they have to be confirmed by the Senate. This selection process is a clear example of how the Checks and Balances system work in the U.S., in which each branch of the government has the power to oversee, check and limit the other branches.
