Answer:
D
Explanation:
I believe it is option D because it is not confusing and it does not use slang. ex "Uggo!"
An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
My personal opinion to what the answers are:
Readers are uneasy with the narrator's growing instability,
Readers question the narrator's ability to act rationally,
Readers understand that the account given by the narrator is true.
I hope this helped, again, this is only my opinion to what I believe the answers are.
