Answer:
this should help
Explanation:
The author of "The Lady or the Tiger?" never reveals what is behind the door. The princess indicates that her lover should choose the door on the right, however, we know that the princess—like her father—has a “barbaric” streak. Furthermore, we know that she hates the lady behind the door and is sick at the thought of her lover being married to her. Ultimately, it is left up to the reader to decide what they think emerged from the door—a lady or a tiger?Stockton, the author of the work, deliberately did not give us the "right" answer to this question. Given that, we can guess and surmise and speculate; however, the answer is still, ultimately, a matter of opinion.Think about this people. The story explains about her barbaric nature like her father’s. We are also told that her lover “knows” her true nature. If these things are true, the princess would have directed him to the door with the tiger, but her lover would have known that. Consequently, he would have chosen the door she did not indicate, and he and the beautiful girl would live happily ever after.With all due respect, I think #3 needs to look at the quoted section of text more closely. " How in her grievous reveries had she gnashed her teeth, and torn her hair, when she saw his start of rapturous delight as he opened the door of the lady!" The princess did not want him to find happiness with anyone else. She had a barbaric nature, and she knew that the beautiful young woman had cast glances upon her lover, and she had perceived those glances to be returned. This would not been taken lightly, and it is safe to say it would probably not be forgiven. In addition, let us not forget the "savage blood" that coursed through her and the "barbaric" ancestry she came from, and the fact that she hated the woman behind the door. It would seem that due to her barbaric nature she would have not wanted her lover to find happiness with another woman, and so we could assume she guided him to the door with the tiger.
Now with all that being said, we are told also that her lover ". . . understood her nature. . .", so if that is true then perhaps he would know she might not want any other woman to have him, and he would choose the door opposite the one she directed him to. So if the lady came out, perhaps it was because he outwitted his barabic lover.
The main purpose of the last line of the passage is to signal the reader that steps will follow.
In the first part of the passage, the author is giving some <em>background information</em> about the topic, which functions as an introduction to develop the main topic. The last sentence serves <em>to trigger</em> what the passage is actually concerned in, that is, the different ways in which contamination by this bacterium can be avoided. Thus, what the reader is expecting after the last line are some steps to follow.
Answer:
D. People can still walk up the stairs to one of the bell towers and take in an amazing view of the city.
Explanation:
This is actually very easy, check it out: Answers B and C have citations included at the end of the material ("Patel 65"), meaning that those sentences have properly displayed a source for the content they incorporate. So, they are not plagiarized. And answer A is a completely unique sentence that takes no words from the exemplified text. Answer D however, takes text directly from the example almost word-for-word without a source citation. Though the author attempted to switch out the word "astonishing" for "amazing," that is one difference of three minimum to avoid plagiarism. So, it has been plagiarized.
Answer:
B. (12) It was started in 2009 by actor Matt Damon and Gary White, the co-founder of Water partners.
Explanation:
"Water Partners" is the title of the other company mentioned
Inductive is the best ordering for narrative essays
