Answer:Buffalo soldier, nickname given to members of African American cavalry regiments of the U.S. Army who served in the western United States from 1867 to 1896, mainly fighting Indians on the frontier. The nickname was given by the Indians, but its significance is uncertain.
Explanation:
The proof that shows that the United States' was willing to compromise on their human rights agenda when it helped meet its Cold War Interests is:
- As a result, the United States actively worked to destabilize Chile's economy and to foster resentment against Allende.
<h3>What is Compromise?</h3>
This refers to the change in policy or values of a person so as to achieve a set goal which is usually unpleasant.
With this in mind, we can see that the United States were ready to compromise their values so that they could win the Cold War by meddling in the affairs of a sovereign nation to oust their leader.
Read more about Cold War here:
brainly.com/question/366925
Answer: starvation and homelessness
Explanation: a lot of the fighting was in the south and a lot of things were destroyed because they were as industrial as the north.
The main <span>effect of Germany's decision to allow *unrestricted* submarine warfare was that the United States was drawn into World War I--since this warfare led to the sinking of the Lusitania, which was carrying many American passengers. </span>
Answer:
While the U.S. Constitution applies to the federal government with the states being subordinate, the Texas Constitution (and all state constitutions) sets in writing what the state government can and cannot do with the counties being subordinate.
While similar to the U.S Constitution, the Texas Constitution has some striking differences, many of which can make it more difficult to file constitutionally based lawsuits under Texas law. One of the most striking differences between the Texas and U.S. Constitutions is length. The U.S. Constitution is intentionally brief and vague, which allows the federal government to broadly interpret it. The Texas Constitution was written leaving little room for interpretation to ensure it cannot be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with the constitution’s ideals.
The Texas Constitution gets its length from going into great detail. While the Texas Constitution grants Texans similar rights to the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution is much more specific regarding exactly when these rights are infringed upon. While it may seem like this specificity would make legal matters cut and dry, in practice it can greatly complicate things.
Explanation:
Make sure to re-word it or use spinbot.com so you don't get caught plagiarizing
