Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
Answer:
was a political and religious leader best remembered for his strong stance on the separation of church and state and founding the colony of Rhode Island
Explanation:
Answer:
1) Earthquakes are being caused by suddenly breaks of underground rock along a fault.
2) The ground is shaking now
3) The rocks are being broken due to all pressure that's being built up
Thank you:G
There are a lot of <span>written works that are often read as a disguised criticism of England's imperialist activities. England was an empire for a longer time. </span>The anti-imperialist criticism varies from books such as Gulliver's Travels and Robinson Crusoe, up to books such as The Jungle Book and 1984.
A discussion moderator, or debate moderator, is a person whose role is to act as a neutral participant in a debate or discussion, holds participants to time limits and tries to keep them from straying off the topic of the questions being raised in the debate.
<em>An example of this is ^^^^^^^</em>
Chris Wallace, he played the moderator in the debates for Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
