The answer is false because the confederates won more battles, so that implies that they had better strategies...not that they had a better cause though...
Hope this helps!
<u>Difference between geographic expansion in New England and in the Chesapeake region:</u>
<u>New England:</u>
- New Englanders as a result of rough soil had constrained cultivating so they needed to go to timber, hide, and angling.
-
Homesteaders in the New England settlements suffered harshly cool winters and mellow summers.
-
The land was level near the coastline yet turned out to be bumpy and rugged more remote inland.
-
The dirt was commonly rough, making cultivating troublesome.
<u>
Chesapeake region:</u>
- The Chesapeake district was, be that as it may, extremely wealthy in soil, and cultivating turned into the primary concern.
- Tobacco, indigo, and rice were the central yields.
-
Religion in the Chesapeake district was not in any manner normal, with the exception of in a couple of zones.
-
The reaction expresses that pioneers in the Chesapeake were increasingly "socialized" with the Indians.
- The province of Maryland was expected as an asylum for Catholics in the wake of being abused when the Catholic Church isolated from the Church of England.
Greene inflicted heavy losses on general Cornwalls's army
Renewable energy sources are important in Eastern Europe because they allow sustainable development.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Pluralism." One negative effect of interest groups is that politicians today cater to the wants and needs of interest groups instead of to the needs of the public. This effect is called pluralism.
