Answer: No, Paul has not breached a contract.
Explanation: To answer this, we must first we must define what a contract is.
A contract is an agreement between two or more people that is legally binding, and which guides or governs the actions or conducts of the parties involved.
A quality that makes a contract legally binding is that it is enforceable by law.
In the scenario given in the question above, Paul has not breached any contract because there isn't one. The promise to buy dinner has not been legally bound, therefore, it is not enforceable by law, in essence, it is not qualified to be called a contract.
1) You can get to know what career suits you the most
2) Know about the relevant options you can go for
3) Know what career suits your qualifications
4) Benefits and pros and cons
Answer:
2 years
Explanation:
Payback period is the length of time it takes for the future cash flows to equal the initial investment.
$224,000 = $112,000 + $112,000
therefore,
It takes 2 years for the cashflows to equal initial investment
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The president appoints a nominee to a judgeship, and then the Senate confirms the nominee.
Answer:
d. hostile takeover; tender offer
Explanation:
The hostile takeover is the transaction of the merger in which the management of the firm i.e. targeted would not support and acquirer could attempt to gain the control for purchasing the enough shares. And this could be achieved via a tender offer
Therefore as per the given situation, the option d is correct
hence, the same is to be considered
