Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
Answer:
Cyrus built his empire by first conquering the Median Empire, then the Lydian Empire, and eventually the Neo-Babylonian Empire. He led an expedition into Central Asia, which resulted in major campaigns that were described as having brought "into subjection every nation without exception."
Explanation:
I think it is B. Fait money only has value as a medium of exchange but idk put it and see if im right I researched it and got that so let me know if im right :)
To keep the governments power in check.
Profits for developed nations mean long hours and low pay for workers in developing nations.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Most of the trades belong to the relation with the country that surrounds it. The lower developing countries always have to depend on the developed country for trade and export.
The prize fixed by the consumer is final and hence the developing countries have low margin profit. Developed countries for cheap labor hire people from the developing countries. They are not only made to work hard for lower wages but also made to work for long hours.
Due to the updated technical resources competition arises within the international trade and new entries are registered every minute. The country with the lower quote gets the trade and hence forced labor with low pay is the main disadvantage.
