What is one way immigrants in the united states in the late 1800's try to assimilate?

1 answer:

8 0

There are three major reasons why people immigrate to other countries: work, love and war. In the late 1800s, immigrants in the United States tried to assimilate with the current populations by learning to speak English and adopting current American cultures and traditions. This is known as the process of Americanization. The idea is that immigrants end up sharing the "American" values, customs and beliefs. The idea behind Americanization is that people who share common values and ideals will contribute to a common cause or goal. This is also known as patriotism.

You might be interested in

Among the failures of Reconstruction was the inability to

eimsori [14]

C) Move black Southerns out of poverty

4 0

2 years ago

If (8 to the power of 9)p = 8 to the power of 18, what's the value of p?

Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

p = 2

Explanation:

(8^9)^p = 8^18

9p = 18

p = 19/9

p = 2

hope this helps u

and have a nice day ahead

8 0

3 years ago

Now Moses kept the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian: and he led the flock to the backside of the desert a

Masja [62]

Moses worked as a shepherd. the answer is A

3 0

2 years ago

Imagine the state of California passes a law to tax all banking activities within the state. Which of the following could happen

Agata [3.3K]

Answer: A

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What is one of the following problems that may have a result from a direct democracy

love history [14]

Answer:

<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>

7 0

2 years ago