What is one way immigrants in the united states in the late 1800's try to assimilate?

1 answer:

8 0

There are three major reasons why people immigrate to other countries: work, love and war. In the late 1800s, immigrants in the United States tried to assimilate with the current populations by learning to speak English and adopting current American cultures and traditions. This is known as the process of Americanization. The idea is that immigrants end up sharing the "American" values, customs and beliefs. The idea behind Americanization is that people who share common values and ideals will contribute to a common cause or goal. This is also known as patriotism.

You might be interested in

I NEED HELP ASAPPPPP

Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

i think its 3 im like 1% sure woulodnt truss me

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What's this answer? can someone help? thanks.

Doss [256]

Comparative advantage I would think. Yep, Google-sensei confirmed it:) Comparative advantage is the answer.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the 1800s, some politicians wanted American Indians to adopt white culture. This idea was called assimilation. settlement. re

bogdanovich [222]

This idea was known as assimilation.

Hope that helped!

It would help me a lot if you gave me a b<span>rainliest answer! Thanks.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is popular culture?

sdas [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Popular culture, in this sense, is created when a certain product "advertises" a figure which is already popular. (Celebrities, Memes ect.) This is usually in the form of merchandise/branding. (Nike, Adidas, Apple).

6 0

3 years ago

The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam

Maksim231197 [3]

Answer: Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests. So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them. As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime." Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion. Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR. That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death. Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism. Again as noted by The Churchill Project: "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire." As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers