Answer:
$260,000
Explanation:
Opening balance = Ending balance - Increase in ending balance
=$66,000 - $10,000
=$56,000
Supplies Expenses = Opening balance + Purchases - Closing balance
=$56,000 + $270,000 - $66,000
=$336,000 - $66,000
=$260,000
Therefore, the amount that will be the adjusting entry to supplies expenses is $260,000
Answer:
The correct answer here would be option D) more of textbooks would be consumed and less of coffee would be consumed.
Explanation:
In economics, substitution effect refers to a situation where there is change in demand of one good in response to the change in price of other goods. Same situation is taking place here as now the price of textbooks have decreased , Ariana will now look to consume more of textbooks and less of coffee.
It would be C because women are thought to be physically weaker and not as useful as men. Women can be useful but in certain professions its a lot harder for them. Also men tend to be more willing to work when they get injured or such.
Answer: Jessica's implicit costs are $46,000.
Implicit costs are the benefits that an individual gives up when they take a decision. Implicit costs are also known as opportunity costs.
In this case, Jessica will lose her salary of $40,000 each year. She will also lose the rent of $6000 a year from the building if she opens her fast food joint. So, total implicit costs are:
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.