The share price for the merged firm is $48.09. Therefore, the correct option is C
<u>Explanation:</u>
(a)-Net Present Value (NPV)
Net Present Value (NPV) = Market Value of the Target Firm + synergistic benefit – Acquisition Value
= [3600 Shares multiply $19] plus $16700 minus [3600 Shares multiply $21]
= $68400 plus 16700 minus 75600
= $9500
“Net Present Value (NPV) = $9500
(b) Share Price
Share price = [Market Value of the Bidding firm + NPV] / Number of shares of the Bidding firm
= [( 8700Shares multiply $47) plus $9500] / 8700 Shares
= [$408900 + 9500] / 8700 Shares
= $48.09 per share
“Share Price = $48.09 per share”
Answer:
a. How are price and quantity demanded related?
b. How should the government deal with the next recession?
Explanation:
A positive question is the kind of question the answer of which is simply yes or no. They ask about how one thing is rather than how something should be.
In above question, there are two questions which fall in the category of positive questions because of the way they are formed and what they are asking.
The Federal Reserve System can do all the given options except A. lender of last resort for consumers.
<h3>What does the federal reserve system do?</h3>
The federal reserve system of the United States is the central bank of the nation and as such, they engage in services like check clearing and regulating the money supply.
They also act as a lender of last resort to banks in order to ensure that they don't fail. The Fed does not lend money to consumers directly so this is not one of their roles.
Options for this question:
- A. lender of last resort for consumers
- B. regulation of the money supply
- C. supplying currency
- D. check clearing
Find out more on the roles of the Federal Reserve at brainly.com/question/14417722
#SPJ1
<u>In a business context, legal counsel is not only a primary and important source of information and advice but is also solely responsible for making decisions about how to resolve a disput</u>e-This statement is false
Explanation:
<u>Alternative dispute resolution options is one of the most popular way to settle legal matters without wasting Time and money in a court cases</u>
There are three main types of formal alternative dispute resolution techniques that are used in the United States. They are
<u>Mediation
</u>
In mediation alternative an independent mediator works with both the parties to come to a resolution.
<u>Arbitration
</u>
Arbitration refers to the term voluntary, many people agree to participate in arbitration before a dispute ACTUALLY arises.
In an arbitration, both the parties agree to have their case heard by an impartial person who is refereed to as an arbitrator, who issues a final and binding decision.
An arbitration case is heard much faster and is less expensive than a court case
<u></u>
<u>Collaborative Law
</u>
This is typically used in the resolution of family law setting as an alternative to litigating a divorce. It is different than mediation or arbitration in the sense that there is no neutral third party.
Answer:
Conveyer Pape should use Foreign Direct Investment instead.
Explanation:
This is a growth strategy where an organization establishes in new country by building its own facilities or acquiring an existing one instead of giving a right to others to operate under its brand name in return for fee(Licensing).
This approach is quite expensive as huge capital outlay is required,but when successful its return on investment is worthwhile compared just receiving token as licensing fee or royalty .
