Bigger companies are more known and have less space to mess up, as a smaller company not as known, are more likely to give up part of the company to other sharrers and i not played smart, could lose the company altogether.
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
Answer: -18.80% for bond J, -15.46% for bond K
Explanation:
If interest rates suddenly rise by 2 percent, the percentage price change of bond J is -18.80% while the percentage price change of bond K is -15.46%
The calculation is provided below
Answer:
Accumulated depreciation= $276,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
On January 2, 2019, Kaiman Corporation acquired equipment for $ 700,000. The estimated life of the equipment is 5 years. The estimated residual value is $ 10,000.
Depreciable value= 700,000 - 10,000= 690,000
Straight-line depreciation= 690,000/5= $138,000
Accumulated depreciation= 138,000*2= $276,000
Someone with the skills mentioned above would be great as (A) a credit analyst.
A credit analyst is <u>a person working in finances whose main job is to assess the creditworthiness of companies, individuals, and securities. </u>
Credit analysts are usually employed by public or private financial institutions (both banking or non-banking).