Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
Answer: Italy, Germany, Japan
Explanation:
The French had more casualties than the Britain or the United states in the World war 1 because of bad strategy in the war.
Explanation:
- France needed a moment to recover 'Alsace-Lorraine', a territory they had failed to the Germans in 1871 (Franco-Prussian war).
- Some archaeologists debate France performed a significant position in the war come about.
- The losses of soldiers produced 700,000 dowagers and higher than 1,000,000 waifs.
- Between 81,000 and 97,000 men from the French territories were shot, including 26,000 Algerians.
- Of France's total count 1 out of 20 were shot. 27,000 French soldiers were shot on August 22nd, 1914 at the Battle of Charleroi.
Answer:
Gave Mexico Central and South America
Explanation:
What this treaty did are every over thing on the list. The treaty ended the war between US and Mexico, it established el Rio Grande as a border but it never gave Mexico South America.
Answer:
what are you trying to ask
Explanation:
if I can help you?
