Answer:
Answer is D / If not : A full image backup, or mirror backup
Explanation:
is an exact replica of everything on your computer's hard drive, from the operating system, boot information, apps, and hidden files to your preferences and settings. Imaging software not only captures individual files, but everything you need to get your system running again.
Thanks for asking this question. If my response helped, please mark as brainliest. Thank you!
Go to your text and scroll until you find your preferred text
Uhh i need points so i don’t fail math.
Answer:
Following are the code in the C Programming Language.
//set integer datatype variable
int score;
//check condition is the score is in the range of 0 to 100
if(score > 0 && score < 100){
//print if condition is true
printf("Valid test scores");
}else{
//otherwise print the following string.
printf("test scores are Invalid");
}
Explanation:
<u>Following are the description of the code.</u>
In the following code that is written in the C Programming Language.
- Set an integer data type variable i.e., score.
- Then, set the if conditional statement to check the condition is the variable "score" is greater than 0 and less the 100.
- If the following statement is true then print "Valid test scores".
- Otherwise, it print "test scores are Invalid".
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
