1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
abruzzese [7]
2 years ago
8

The person most known for contributing to the final form of the constitution was

History
2 answers:
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]2 years ago
6 0
I think you forgot to give the choices along with the question. i am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. <span>The person most known for contributing to the final form of the constitution was James Madison. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your desired help.</span>
nordsb [41]2 years ago
4 0

James Madison

James Madison is referred to as the Father of the Constitution. He authored the document and provided the structure for the document. He also created the concept for the Bill of Rights and amendment process.

James Madison structured the Constitution on his writing of the Federalist Papers. The Federalist papers provided the reasons why a Constitution was needed and the basic principles of the Constitution. Though other men were involved in the concepts and writing of the Constitution, it is Madison that gets much of the credit for the document. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson both contributed based on their early documents written during the Revolution. Alexander Hamilton also contributed to the Constitution through his contribution of the Federalist Papers.

You might be interested in
How did missionaries and monks help spread christianity into new areas?
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

During the time of the monks the literacy rate were extremely low, only about 3% could read and or write and most were monks. The monks copied down ancient writings like the Bible and taught the Gospel to other people who had taken the opportunity.

Missionaries spread were people, who probably learned it from the monks, who traveled around to preach the Gospel most later became martyrs.

Martyr refers to the people who are willing to sacrifice their life for a certain cause. In the past, many Christian missionaries become a martyr by defending their religion in the face of torture and execution. As the news of their death spread, they indirectly showed the strength of their belief which ignite other people's will to adopt the religion.

HOPE THIS HELPS!

Brainliest are rlly appreciated

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is considered part of a country’s infrastructure?
Oliga [24]
Hospitals I believe. I have been taking a test on economics and had this as a question as well. I'm not so sure, but I do believe that the correct answer would be the third one, hospitals. 
Hopefully i'm right, and we both get it right haha. And well I hope this helped. 
7 0
3 years ago
Why is it harder to change the Constitution than it is to pass law?
mina [271]
C I think. Was there a passage to read?
8 0
2 years ago
How did Mandela’s tactics differ from Gandhi’s? (Gandhi believed in nonviolent protest)
nadezda [96]

SIMILARITIES —The depth of oppression in South Africa created Nelson Mandela, a revolutionary par excellence, and many others like him: Oliver Tambo, Walter Sisulu, Albert Lutuli, Yusuf Dadoo and Robert Sobukwe — all men of extraordinary courage, wisdom, and generosity. In India, too, thousands went to jail or kissed the gallows, in their crusade for freedom from the enslavement that was British rule. In The Gods are Athirst, Anatole France, the French novelist, seems to say to all: “Behold out of these petty personalities, out of these trivial commonplaces, arise, when the hour is ripe, the most titanic events and the most monumental gestures of history.”

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi spent his years in prison in line with the Biblical verse, “Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.” Nelson Mandela was shut off from his countrymen for 27 years, imprisoned, until his release on February 11, 1990. Both walked that long road to freedom. Their unwavering commitment to nationalism was not only rooted in freedom; it also aspired towards freedom. Both discovered that after climbing a great hill, one only finds many more to climb. They had little time to rest and look back on the distance they had travelled. Both Mandela and the Mahatma believed freedom was not pushed from behind by a blind force but that it was actively drawn by a vision. In this respect, as in many other ways, the convergence of the Indian and South African freedom struggles is real and striking.

Racial prejudice characterised British India before independence as it marred colonial rule in South Africa. Gandhi entered the freedom struggle without really comprehending the sheer scale of racial discrimination in India. When he did, however, he did not allow himself to be rushed into reaction. The Mahatma patiently used every opportunity he got to defy colonial power, to highlight its illegitimate rule, and managed to overcome the apparently unassailable might of British rule. Gandhi’s response to the colonial regime is marked not just by his extraordinary charisma, but his method of harnessing “people power.”

Nelson Mandela used similar skills, measuring the consequences of his every move. He organised an active militant wing of the African National Congress — the Spear of the Nation — to sabotage government installations without causing injury to people. He could do so because he was a rational pragmatics.

DIFFERENCES—Both Gandhi and Nelson Mandela are entitled to our affection and respect for more than one reason. They eschewed violence against the person and did not allow social antagonisms to get out of hand. They felt the world was sick unto death of blood-spilling, but that it was, after all, seeing a way out. At the same time, they were not pacifists in the true sense of the word. They maintained the evils of capitulation outweighed the evils of war. Needless to say, their ideals are relevant in this day and age, when the advantages of non-violent means over the use of force are manifest.

Gandhi and Mandela also demonstrated to the world they could help build inclusive societies, in which all Indians and South Africans would have a stake and whose strength, they argued, was a guarantee against disunity, backwardness and the exploitation of the poor by the elites. This idea is adequately reflected in the make-up of the “Indian” as well as the “South African” — the notion of an all-embracing citizenship combined with the conception of the public good.

At his trial, Nelson Mandela, who had spent two decades in the harsh conditions of Robben Island, spoke of a “democratic and free society in which all persons live in harmony and with equal opportunities. […] It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve, but if need be, an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”

The speed with which the bitterness between former colonial subjects and their rulers abated in South Africa is astonishing. Mandela was an ardent champion of “Peace with Reconciliation,” a slogan that had a profound impact on the lives of ordinary people. He called for brotherly love and integration with whites, and a sharing of Christian values. He did not unsettle traditional dividing lines and dichotomies; instead, he engaged in conflict management within a system that permitted opposing views to exist fairly.

7 0
3 years ago
17. A personal and individual relationship with God is called a
Ilya [14]

Answer: is a vocation

Explanation: Vocation is one’s response to a call from beyond oneself to use one’s strengths and gifts to make the world a better place through service, creativity, and leadership.

A call from beyond oneself.

The concept of vocation rests on the belief that life is about more than me. To speak of “vocation” or “calling” is to suggest that my life is a response to something beyond myself. Christians believe this “something beyond myself” is God. But even people outside of this tradition often sense a call to serve others, to create beauty, and to do good in the world. A call may be experienced in many ways, including the following:

A sense that God is leading me to a particular task, relationship, or mission.

A deep desire to get involved when I am confronted with the needs of others.

A sense that a particular task or kind of work is what I am supposed to be doing with my life at this particular time.

Personal fulfilment that I experience as I am involved in a particular task or work.

The affirmation of others who recognize the work I am doing and the contributions I am making to the world.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which phrase correctly completes box #2 in the chart above?
    11·2 answers
  • NEED HELP ASAP!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • Which law did Hoover's administration help pass to limit the quantity of goods that American farmers could sell to other countri
    10·1 answer
  • The two Chinese groups that fought one another before the invasion of Manchuria were the
    12·2 answers
  • Why did war break out between native Americans and the U.S. goverment
    8·2 answers
  • During the new nation period, what happens when England and France are involved in a dispute?
    10·2 answers
  • The term Nisei refers to Japanese Americans who:
    10·1 answer
  • Colonists were angered by a restriction in the Intolerable Acts that required them to
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of the fear of anarchy in the United States in the 1920s?
    10·2 answers
  • Gummie to all <br><br>________________​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!