Answer: B on edge : Swift criticizes landlords for exploiting families.
Explanation:
Answer:
Doesn't get you to your location faster.
Hope this helps & good luck!
Feel free to message me if you need more help! :)
Answer:
1. Inside
2. Use dialogue, write as if you were in a conversation, vary your sentences, give it a personal touch, and use humor (if appropriate)
3. Questions and answers are used together. Short sentences are sandwiched between longer ones. No sentence is built exactly like the one before it.
4. It is more interesting to the reader to feel there is a real person behind the writing, and sometimes the reader can relate to your experience.
5. A humorous quotation or anecdote.
Explanation:
What does LANDSCAPE mean in this sentence?
“All was right with the world again, and Miguel felt renewed strength and wonder at the landscape before him...”
B. Scenery that is in view
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
