Yeah? why wouldn't it be. It can create energy just from light and we can harness it in solar panels.
At a celebratory dinner for a recent publication, a marine biologist ordered the lobster claw appetizer. She ordered Cheliped.
<h3>What is Cheliped?</h3>
The chelipeds are the large claws that the crayfish uses for defense and to capture prey. Each of the four remaining segments contains a pair of walking legs. In the abdomen, the first five segments each have a pair of swimmerets, which create water currents and function in reproduction.
It is of the pair of legs that bears the large chelae in decapod crustaceans. It is a very delicious and nutricious food item. Some people are allergic but max people has no problem with this Cheliped .
From the above discussion we can conclude that at that celebratory dinner for a recent publication, that marine biologist ordered the Cheliped of lobster claw appetizer.
To know more about the lobster claw please click here : brainly.com/question/10006169
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u><em>All of the above.</em></u>
Explanation:
1. Their watertight skin minimizes moistures loss: <em>Reptiles have a reputation that they are “slimy” when we touch and hold them; however, they have dry skin, which has even fewer glands than mammals or amphibians. The main special feature of their skin is that the epidermis is heavily keratinized with a layer, which also prevents water loss.</em>
2. Amphibians must lay eggs in water or in moist soil to reduce moisture loss: <em>Because amphibian eggs don't have an amnion, the eggs would dry out if they were laid on the land, so amphibians lay their eggs in water.</em>
3. Reptile egg shells are harder than amphibians' eggs: <em>Reptile eggs are coated with a leathery or brittle coating, and the animals that hatch from them are miniature versions of the full-sized animal parent. In contrast, amphibian eggs are transparent and jelly-like. The animals that hatch from them still must go through metamorphosis.</em>
<u><em>Hope this helps you have a better understanding:) !!</em></u>
Answer:
Option A, an unconstitutional restriction of speech
Explanation:
Please see the attachment
