Explanation:
Hamilton made two principal points in the essay. First, he argued for the independence of the judiciary from the other two branches of government, the executive and the legislative. In presenting a case for the judiciary, he reached his second major conclusion: that the judiciary must be empowered to strike down laws passed by Congress that it deems "contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution."
In presenting his argument for the independence of the judiciary, Hamilton claimed that it was by far the weakest of the three branches. It did not, he said, have the "sword" of the executive, who is commander in chief of the nation's armed forces, nor the "purse" of the legislature, which approves all the tax and spending measures of the national government. It had, according to Hamilton, "neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment."
---------------------THANK YOU------------------------------
Hello <span>Samahayache1946
</span>
Answer: George H. W.Bush, the Republican defeated Democratic Michael Dukakis in the 1988 election.
Hope That Helps
-Chris
Answer:
As a result of this law, the colonists agreed to boycott British goods and to make their own products. After the Boston Massacre, the British removed most of the taxes created by the Townshend Acts. The only tax Parliament left in place was a tax on
Large buildings with barreled shaped roofs covered in bark made by Native Americans and other peoples across the world were considered "longhouses" in the Americas. These longhouses were permanent structures that housed many families of the same clan in a singular building.
<span>A drawback of the Weimar Republic is that The Weimar Government
did not have a constitution. After the First World War, the Weimar Republic
attempted to create a perfect democracy in the country. Having no constitution
became a drawback because there is no law to guide the people and they are
all free to do what they want. No restrictions, No limitations.</span>
