Answer:
Explanation:
General Editor’s Preface
The reception given to a writer by his contemporaries and nearcontemporaries isevidence of considerable value to the student of literature. On one side we learna great deal about the state of criticism at large and in particular about thedevelopment of critical attitudes towards a single writer; at the same time, throughprivate comments in letters, journals or marginalia, we gain an insight upon thetastes and literary thought of individual readers of the period. Evidence of thiskind helps us to understand the writer’s historical situation, the nature of hisimmediate reading-public, and his response to these pressures.
A literary mode rather than a distinguishable genre, magical realism is characterized by two conflicting perspectives, one based on a so-called rational view of reality and the other on the acceptance of the supernatural as prosaic reality. Magical realism differs from pure fantasy primarily because it is set in a normal, modern world with authentic descriptions of humans and society. It aims to seize the paradox of the union of opposites; for instance, it challenges binary oppositions like life and death and the pre-colonial past versus the post-industrial present. According to Angel Flores, magical realism involves the fusion of the real and the fantastic, or as he claims, “an amalgamation of realism and fantasy.” The presence of the supernatural in magical realism is often connected to the primeval or magical “native” mentality, which exists in opposition to European rationality (See Myths of the Native<span>). According to Ray Verzasconi, as well as other critics, magical realism is “an expression of the New World reality which at once combines the rational elements of the European super-civilization, and the irrational elements of a primitive America.” Gonzalez Echchevarria believes that magical realism offers a world view that is not based on natural or physical laws nor objective reality. However, the fictional world is not separated from reality either.</span>
D: It is used to emphasize their great knowledge <span />
Their difference comes about as a result of Marley's death and his visit as a ghost to Scrooge on Christmas Eve. Marley warns Scrooge on the consequences for not upholding human values such as Charity, Benevolence, Mercy, Forebearance, loving and caring for other, and cherishing the spirit of Christmas. He warned him that Scrooge would be doomed to wander about after he was dead but still could redeem himself with the visits of the other three ghosts of Christmas that brings about Scrooges dramatic change. His redemption is the point and purpose of the story. So Marley, his avaricious and misanthropic partner, prompts Scrooge to atone for his wicked ways, something Marley did not do before he died. Marley is doomed in his past failure for eternity while Scrooge is redeemed for eternity.
that is the answer hope it helps
