Answer:
A vassal needed economic resources to equip the cavalry he was bound to contribute to his lord to fight his frequent wars. Such resources, in the absence of a money economy, came only from land and its associated assets, which included peasants as well as wood and water.
Russian version:
Вассалу нужны были экономические ресурсы, чтобы вооружить кавалерию, которую он должен был предоставить своему господину для ведения частых войн. Такие ресурсы, в отсутствие денежной экономики, поступали только из земли и связанных с ней активов, которые включали крестьян, а также древесину и воду.
Sorry if the translation is incorrect I had to use goo.gle translate/Извините, если перевод правильный, мне пришлось использовать гугл переводчик.
It was "farmers" who <span>benefitted the least from the prosperity of the second industrial revolution, since this revolution mostly included the advent of new factories and urban laborers. </span>
They were all on the outskirt of the two sides and every one of them had motivations to go both routes in the contention.
Maryland was a slave state and from multiple points of view held to an indistinguishable thoughts from the Confederates. The most compelling motivation that they went poorly them is on the grounds that the US government ensured there were a lot of troops there, so Washington DC wasn't cut off amidst Confederate land.
Both Missouri and Kentucky had their own smaller than expected form of the Civil War going, where neighbors battled with neighbors.
Slaves were sold which means money was traded and you need money to successfully thrive and so when it ended there was no more money so they had to find different ways and it took a while.
