Answer:
a. Plan I is better is we drive 300 miles in a day.
b. 150 miles.
Explanation:
a. if mileage is 300 then rental charges will be,
Plan I : $36 + 17 cents * miles
$36 + 0.17 * 300 = $41.10.
Plan II : $24 + 25 cents * miles
$24 + 0.25 * 300 = $99.00
Plan I total cost for 300 miles is $41.10 whereas Plan II total cost for 300 miles is $99.00. Plan I is better plan and cost effective.
b. For mileage (m) calculation we will use equation;
Plan I = Plan II
$36 + 0.17m = $24 +0.25m
0.25m - 0.17m = $36 - $24
m = $12 / 0.08
m = 150 miles.
Answer:
B. There is an increase in income and "spring shoes" are a normal good.
Explanation:
To eliminate the disequilibrium in the market for shoes, spring shoes firstly needs to be seen as a normal product because if it is seen an inferior product then as people's Income rises they woudnt want to buy inferior products because they have the income to buy normal products. As people income rises, since spring shoes is seen as a normal product, then people will buy springshoes
Answer:
Jones is liable to pay.
He is liable to pay to the tune of $1000. This may be negotiated however if it is not fair.
Explanation:
See the following points
- The question above is an example of Implied At-law contracts. (We will get to the definition of this in a bit).
- A contract is a legally binding agreement that recognises and governs the rights and duties of the parties to the agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the requirements and approval of<u> the Law</u>. From the above definition it is clear that two people may actually be engaging in a contract without knowing it.
- The law defines that a contract is.
- Contracts may be Express or Implied.
- Express contracts are simply contracts that are stated expressly, or openly, in either writing or orally, at the time of contract formation.
- Implied contracts are created when two or more parties have no written contract.
- There are two types of implied contracts:
- Implied In-Fact Contracts: these are contracts which create an obligation between the parties based on the facts of the situation. For example, assume your neighbor hires you to wash his car every Friday for the entire holidays. You wash your neighbor’s car for the first four weekends of the holidays and get paid on Friday morning each time. The fifth Friday you wash the car and when you arrive at your neighbor’s house for your pay, your neighbor refuses to pay you. The law will infer that there is a contract between you and your neighbor, even though you never put anything in writing. This is an implied in-fact contract.
2. The other type of Implied contract is that which is Implied At-Law
In the case between Jones and Smith, the law imposes a duty to perform a contract, and will enforce such a contract even against a person’s will, where the situation is such that without this legal intervention, one party would be <u>unfairly enriched</u> or advantaged by another party’s action.
- In the question above, Smith is a CPA. He is qualified in every respect to carry out Professional Tax services. His services may be relied upon with a great degree of confidence.
- If Jones had not filed those tax returns, he probably would have lost monies that should have accrued to him from the government.
This type of agreement is also considered a quasi-contract. A quasi-contract occurs where the law imposes an obligation upon the parties where in fact the parties did not intend to enter into a contract and made no promise to perform.
However, because one party would be unjustly enriched by another party’s action, the beneficiary of those actions must make restitution or pay fair value for the services provided, even though there was never any intention to enter into an agreement.
Cheers!
Price is taken to be a given by an individual firm selling in a purely competitive market because each seller supplies a negligible fraction of total market.
Purely competitive market refers to a marketing situation in which there are a large number of sellers of a product which cannot be differentiated selling a standardized product and therefore, no single firm has a significant influence on the product price. It is characterized, furthermore, by ease of entry for new companies into the market and perfect market information. Hence, the sellers in such a market are considered to be price takers. Examples of purely competitive market are agricultural products such as wheat or corn.
Learn more about Purely competitive market:
brainly.com/question/15176320
#SPJ4
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
