Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
Given that:
McLin holds $90,000 of AEP, this implies what is salary is made of;
Tobias, the sole shareholder, has an adjusted basis of $80,000 in his stock.
Tobias is paid a $90,000 salary income.
Ignore the 20% QBID
We are to determine the tax aspects of the transactions
Since the company receives a $90000 for salary expense. Thus Tobias basis is zero, then :
The tax aspect of the transaction is : ($90000 - $80000)
The tax aspect of the transaction = $10,000
Answer:
Explanation:
There is a correlation between inflation and house prices. ... When interest rates are low, buying homes can be more affordable and increase the demand for homes. If the supply of homes remains constant and the demand increases, then the prices of homes will increase.
Answer:
$13,532
.00
Explanation:
The cost allocation is usually based on a measurable factor such as area occupied, number of students etc. The more the measurable factor related to a unit/department, the more the cost assigned to the departments on the basis of the size of the measurable value.
Total number of employees
= 640
the amount of cost allocated to Department B under the direct method would be
= 199/640 * $43,520
= $13,532
Answer:
£30 million
Explanation:
Banks net exposure serves as the the money currently owned by the bank.
Credit to bank;
Loans to corporate customers is bank's money since customers will repay the loan back to the bank even with interest = £120 million
Total credit owned by the bank =
£120 million
Debit;
Deposit owned to customers = £70 million (It is customers money not bank's)
Money sold forward by bank is also going out of banks pocket (debit) =£20 million
Total debt owned by bank = £70 million+£20 million = £90 million
Bank's net exposure = Total credit - debt owned by bank
Banks net exposure = £120 million - £90 million
= £30 million
<span>The main assumption that has to be true for Adam Smith's theories to be valid is that everyone is acting in a way that most benefits them and nobody else. Since resources are seen as limited, people are thought to act in ways that most benefit them and nobody else. These assumptions might be valid in many cases, but the concept of charity shows that they are not always the case, and the invisible hand might be guiding people at times, but not always.</span>
