Dollars - currency exchange market
Shares -stock markets
Wheat-commodity market
Conforming Loan Limits Increase By 18% in 2021 for the Year Ahead.
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
(D) is the same and output is lower than in the original long-run equilibrium.
Explanation:
In the long term the prices are flexible. They adapt to the new situation of a decrease in the demand. This is consistent with with a lower output, consecuences of the decreasing in the demand.
Answer:
$227,500
Explanation:
The computation of the total amount of cash paid is shown below:
Cash paid for insurance premium = Prepaid Insurance at end of the year + Prepaid Insurance recognized - Prepaid Insurance at the beginning of the year
= $61,250 + $218,750 - $52,500
= $227,500
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct amount of cash paid could come with respect to the insurance premium