Answer:
Exposition: Tom Benecke & his wife are home, Tom goes to work while his wife is preparing to leave the house to the theatre.
Rising Action : His Wife leaves, he works on an extremely important paper that flies out the window. He goes outside his window & ledge to retrieve it. He gets his paper.
Complication : Tom decides to break the window but this is a risk since he could die. He decided he'll wait for his wife to come back home. He struggles to get people's help.
Climax : Tom is hanging off the ledge & one slip up will result in his death.
Falling Action : Tom finally breaks the window & climbs inside.
Denouement : Tom realizes he needs to go look for his wife & spend more time with her.
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
The Civil War impact on literature was mainly seen in the resurgence of the Slave Narrative (prior, through and after the war), as well as Transcendentalism and Realism in literature.
Answer:
it is a quote by Gertrude Stein.....
The speech this question is referring to is President Kennedy's Special Message to the Congress on Urgent National Needs, May 25, 1961
Kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:
<em>"Yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. They have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. They send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. But where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in Vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)</em>
President Kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation.
The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
