Answer:
(this is for the connections quiz) D, stamp, quartering act, smuggling, BD, B, Charles Cornwallis is the British general, Marquis is the French general, and John Jay is the American diplomat, idk this one, B, strengths - ability to make laws, mutual defense, weaknesses- dependence on states fir funds, unicameral legislature, causes - states refusal, governments inability to tax, effects - new constitutional, influential men, B, paragraph, B, A, C, paragraph
Explanation:
Answer:
In the election of 1800, the Federalist incumbent John Adams ran against the rising Republican Thomas Jefferson. ... Unfortunately，Jefferson and his vice-presidential running mate Aaron Burr both received the identical number of electoral votes, and the House of Representatives voted to break the tie
Answer:
D
think of candida as a Corgi and Mexico and a Chihuahua and the .U.S. is a pitbull. it is part of the monroe document,if Asia, or Eroup attack them then we will get involved.
Answer:
Maryans used a writing system called Sanskrit, this system is used in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism.
Explanation:
I'm doing the chart, and this is right.
<span>I
think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader
will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the
projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their
aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes
that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its
identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to
gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a
party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political
influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may
(1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great
opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if
arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing
views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>
