Answer:
the last one
Explanation
Because the law makers have to keep up to date on ideas,and with many using the media nowadays they have to transfer to using media for Intel
Justice Rehnquist intended for his statement to convey how the court's ruling will alter and complicate the application of the statute governing the first-trimester abortions.
Justice Rehnquist questioned the scope and the significance of the law and questioned whether it was really that important to prevent the state from getting involved in the matters of the abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy after the court based its argument on the fundamental constitutional right to privacy or liberty. Justice Rehnquist thought that using the law would become more difficult as a result of the court's ruling in the matter.
To know more about Abortions:
brainly.com/question/28459534
#SPJ4
I believe it’s A or B I’m leaning towards A but I’ll look up the definition definition: “intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time” so The answer is
ANSWER- B
1910.1200(g)(8)
The employer shall maintain in the workplace copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and shall ensure that they are readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s).
Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
Explanation:
Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.
The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.