Yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy
Direct democracy : a condition in which the people are directly involved in the Governance
Socialist : a condition in which a country's resource are controlled by social community and also for their own benefit
hope this helps
Answer: classical conditioning
Explanation: Phobia are acquired through classical conditioning and maintained via operant conditioning, Carlos acquired the phobia because of his encounter with the bear thus, classical conditioning way of acquiring phobia. The operant conditioning of the Carlos's phobia is due to the fact that he still avoids bears i.e he keeps or maintained his phobia.
Democracy means the government made for the people, by the people and of the people. To make the democracy successful, rulers and ruled should be responsible about their code of conducts.
To institutionalize the democracy, people have to make a right choice about selecting their leader. They must have the knowledge about all the leaders and government policies. The people have to be aware about the responsibility and right that comes on them in democracy.
The ruler selected by the public should know the necessary policies for the welfare of the economy and the public. He must be fair in his conduct and work for the betterment.
Answer: C
Explanation: In 1886, the Supreme Court ruled in Wabash v. Illinois that the state of Illinois could not regulate the rates that the Wabash Railroad was charging as its freight traffic was Interstate. It emphasized that only the federal government, through Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce.
This case overturned the earlier Munn vs. Illinois case, whereby states had the power to regulate businesses dealing with interstate commerce.
The Wabash decision led to the creation of the Interstate Commerce Commission in 1887; this was the first modern regulatory agency of its kind.
The right to hear a case first.
Lower courts have the first opportunity for have a trial for a case which is the original jurisdiction. Higher courts are for appeals and hear cases if the verdict in the lower court is thought to be inaccurate because legal proceedings were not properly followed.
