1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksi-84 [34.3K]
3 years ago
12

World war i was known as a "total war" because it involved the efforts of many civilians in addition to the military. today, how

ever, warfare can be drastically different. how would all quiet on the western front be different if it were told from the perspective of a modern- day american soldier during, say, the war on terror in afghanistan? what events would be different? what ideas and issues might change?
History
1 answer:
Sati [7]3 years ago
4 0
If the story of "All Quiet on the Western Front" was told today, the story would be much different, especially if it was told from the viewpoint of an American soldier involved in the War on Terror. First, the protagonist would not be coming from a nation that is in a state of total war.  The War on Terror is a limited war and does not require the undivided focus of the American government, industry, and economy.  A soldier, today, would likely be volunteering to join the military, instead of being all but forced to like the characters in "All Quiet on the Western Front."  Second, the total detachment the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" feel from their civilian lives would not be as pronounced, given how today's soldiers are able to communicate with their friends and family back home by way of email, online chat, and quicker postal service.  Thirdly, today's American soldiers are provided with far better and more extensive military training than the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" are, hence they would be more prepared for the combat experiences they must endure. 
You might be interested in
Had troops of the black regiment led the Battle of the Crater attack, why would it probably have succeeded?
9966 [12]

The correct answer is the letter C)They had trained and rehearsed for the mission.

The Battle of Crater, at the first moment, was led by Burnside who accepted the division of African American troops into his formation. Though these troops had spent most of their service guarding wagon trains and building fortifications, Burnside believed their enthusiasm would compensate for their lack of combat experience. Also, each brigade in Ferrero’s division trained for its role in Burnside’s carefully choreographed scheme. However, one day before the action, Burnside’s superior, Maj. Gen. George Meade, ordered Burnside to select a white unit instead, saying he did not want to be blamed for a “massacre” of colored troops. This way, untrained and ill-prepared, Ledlie’s men led one of the Civil War’s most calamitous attacks.

5 0
3 years ago
Both the free soil and the know nothing parties: ​
Yakvenalex [24]
Your answer is A - took members away from the major party
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was often the source of conflict between pastoral and agricultural village societies?
storchak [24]
Pasture - While pastoral peoples capitalized on grazing their large herds of cattle, agricultural people kept small herds. As such, anytime pastoralists ventured into agricultural zones, conflict erupted as both jostled to utilize the pasture available.  
3 0
3 years ago
I need help with 4 - 6 plzzz
77julia77 [94]

Explanation:

Which one of the following task is not done at the da

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements about the Civil War is FALSE? a. President Lincoln’s election caused several states to secede.
Anika [276]

When it comes to the Civil War, it is false that C. Sam Houston believed slavery to be <u>unconstitutional</u>.

<h3>Who was Sam Houston?</h3>
  • He was a Senator of the United States from the South.
  • He was a Slaveowner who defended slavery.

Sam Houston did not want the South to secede from the North but he also defended slavery as a tool that allowed the U.S. to be built. He therefore did not think it was unconstitutional.

In conclusion, option C is correct.

Find out more on Sam Houston at brainly.com/question/1399699.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Abraham lincoln’s primary impact on the constitution of the transcontinental railroad was to
    6·1 answer
  • Why is Homo Habilis so important?
    15·2 answers
  • The Colombian Exchange was the nick name for the triangular slave trade...True or False
    8·2 answers
  • Could some help me plz
    6·1 answer
  • What did 19th century imperalisim have to do with this 20th century genocide
    5·1 answer
  • Tell a joke/roast for points.
    9·2 answers
  • Why did Franklin D. Roosevelt go to georgia?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the olmecas do?<br><br> ANSWER ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • What were the major ideas included in the constitution?.
    12·1 answer
  • Connor has played football and baseball all four years of his high school career. He has been offered a football scholarship wor
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!