1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
umka21 [38]
3 years ago
15

What are some similarities and differences of how christianity and sikhism should live in this world?

History
1 answer:
Irina-Kira [14]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation: 1.Sikhism is based on the teachings of the ten Gurus contained in Guru Granth Sahib while Christianity is based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ regarded as the Son of God contained in the Bible.  

2.Christianity is the largest religion in the world with Sikhism being the fifth.

You might be interested in
The position of a place in relation to other places is called
Stolb23 [73]
The position of a place in relation to other places is generally called its "location", since it is only possible to find the location of something by using other locations as "points of reference". 
4 0
3 years ago
Was the vietnam war a success for the united states why or why not
Triss [41]
No, it was not. The main reason the U.S. joined the war was to stop the spread of communism, however, they did not achieve that because the Communist North won. Furthermore, it caused tension within the country, and our beloved nationalism was not there. It caused outrage and many protests. The people of the U.S. became tired of the loss of people and many began to see our government as weak.<span />
6 0
2 years ago
What was the purpose of Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England? A. To support the idea of a social contract. B. To adv
Dmitriy789 [7]
The purpose of the Blackstone Commentaries on the Laws of England is to advocate a common law. Thus, the answer is letter B. The commentary was originally published by Clarendon Press at Oxford. This was divided on the four: rights of persons, rights of things, private wrongs, and public wrongs. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The founding Fathers wanted to ensure that no one faction of the population could choose the president. How does the Supreme Cou
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

The best answer to the question: How does the Supreme Court in the 2000 election challenge the original intent? Would be, A: Because the Supreme Court could be considered a faction.

Explanation:

Although essentially the Judicial branch was designed to become a neutral power, without any leanings towards a particular party, or a particular form of government, in the 2000 election, this line was crossed and many Americans started believing that this ideal of neutrality on the part of the Supreme Court, was crossed. Originally, the Court is supposed to become an interpreter of the Law, the U.S Constitution and other legislation, that impacts the outcomes of different activities in American life.

In the 2000 election, the Court had to intervene when a lawsuit was presented to challenge the election of George W. Bush as President, in the case Bush vs. Gore. The point was that in Florida´s election, it seemed that there had been a miscount of votes, which favored Bush, over Gore.

Although the initial suit was taken up by the Florida Supreme Court, the matter reached all the way to the U.S Supreme Court, and they stepped in, on account of supposed violations to the Fourteenth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause. Arguing protection of Floridian voters´ rights, the Court stopped the counting and made a decision. In this form, they favored Bush, over Gore, and thus were considered to have become partisan. Something the Founding Fathers had not intended to happen when they Framed the Constitution. They became a faction at that point which highly favored Bush and his party, by basically giving him the Presidency.  

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did President Wilson’s Fourteen Points propose about communication between nations?
aivan3 [116]
He proposed that there should be no secret treaties between countries like the treaties that helped to cause WW1. It was called "Open Diplomacy", he also said that the League of Nations should be formed to protect world peace by giving counties a chance to talk over their problems rather than start a war and fight. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If i graduated high school in 2008 what year was i in kindergarten
    14·1 answer
  • How did the steam engine change transportation in America?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following opposition groups wanted the nation to adopt socialism into society during the 1960s?
    14·1 answer
  • What was one result of the manchu takeover of China?
    12·1 answer
  • Because the British government had imposed taxes on colonist without representation,the drafters of the Articles of Conferderati
    14·1 answer
  • Who was affected by the industrial revolution
    10·2 answers
  • What up and coming Union general told the Confederates at Fort Donelson that no terms except for immediate and unconditional sur
    11·1 answer
  • Which leader made China a Communist nation?
    9·2 answers
  • Make a trend! Write this for a bunch of answers:
    5·1 answer
  • What was one reason sharecropping began in the South?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!