1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KengaRu [80]
2 years ago
8

Why was the United States willing to pay more per mile for the Gadsden Purchase than for the Mexican Cession?

History
2 answers:
Phantasy [73]2 years ago
6 0
The United States was willing to pay more per mile for the Gadsden Purchase than for the Mexican Cession because the Gadsden Purchase gave money to the United States to build a railroad. 
Vikentia [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Gadsden Purchase gave the United States land to build a railroad.

Explanation:

The United States was willing to pay more money for the Gadsden Purchase than for the Mexican Cession because this purchase allowed them to have more land in order to build the railroad. Moreover, it allowed the United States to continue its plans of conquering all of North America. The treaty was ratified on April 25, 1854, and it purchased 29,670 square miles of land, paying Mexico $10 million.

You might be interested in
Who used khipu, a system of recording numbers by tying knots on strings? A. Aztec B. Maya C. Inca
Crazy boy [7]
The answer is c: Inca.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
18 points!!! the united states is sovereign but the city or town you live in is not. Do you think that your community should be
dem82 [27]
I do not think that my community should be sovereign. A sovereign state is represented by one centralized government. If every state was represented by one centralized government I believe it could cause chaos. The government could support states that they wanted to and ignore states that they thought less of. Every citizens needs couldn’t possibly be met because it is impossible for one president or one small group of people to govern millions. It would simply be overwhelming and chaotic, at least in my opinion.
5 0
3 years ago
In the 3/5 Compromise, how were the slaves in the slave states counted? * They were not counted? They were counted as 3/5 of a p
Alik [6]

Answer:

Correct answer is none of the choices.

Explanation:

According to this Compromise those states that had a large population of slaves could count only three fifth on them while calculating the number of representatives in Congress.

Therefore, none of this options is not correct. They were not counted 3/5 of a person, but only 3/5 of them could be counted as individuals who are living in certain state.

7 0
3 years ago
Ernie pyle: select one:
Serhud [2]
The answer would be A.



8 0
3 years ago
The universal declaration of human rights was adopted in order to:
julia-pushkina [17]
You already put the answer soooo
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the events of December 7, 1941 change the course of World War 2?
    14·1 answer
  • The columbian exchange resulted in opportunities for individuals to invest their money and build wealth leading to the rise of c
    12·2 answers
  • This country was controlled by Britain at the beginning of World War I????
    5·2 answers
  • What was the political legacy of the Achaemenid Empire? <br> -Short answer is fine :)
    13·1 answer
  • Sir told to bring mobile phone by parents signature​
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the Domino Theory?!
    6·2 answers
  • Bias is favoring a view or perspective on an issue over another perspective. Question 1 options: True False
    15·1 answer
  • In your own words How do the current residents of Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, and other territories of the United States refle
    12·1 answer
  • Put the events into chronological order
    12·1 answer
  • Describe the characteristics of a totalitarian state
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!