All categories

3 years ago

Which statement best summarizes the Court’s rulings on the constitutional requirements of confinement?

1 answer:

3 0

As the options are not included with this question, we cannot chose a particular statement. Nevertheless, we are able to explain what the Supreme Court has ruled when it comes to the constitutional requirements of confinement.

The first case that addressed such conditions was that of <em>Holt v. Sarver</em>, in 1970. This was the first in a series of common law cases that found state prison systems to violate the Eighth Amendment. This amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment.

This series of cases established that confinement should not include the unnecessary infliction of pain, nor should conditions be grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime warranting imprisonment. The restrictions placed on prisoners can be restrictive, and even harsh, but should not become cruel. This includes the display of deliberate indifference in emergencies on the part of officials, or malicious and sadistic acts.

You might be interested in

What’s is 2.4 if word form

Marina86 [1]

Answer:

lawyer serving as third-party neutral

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Do you think it was important for congress to finish what they started?

IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

it depends

Explanation:

you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.

if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.

7 0

2 years ago

What part of the country has the highest incidents of capital punishment

Anarel [89]

Answer:

Explanation:

China is the world's most active death penalty country; according to Amnesty International, China executes more people than the rest of the world combined per annum. In Iran and Saudi Arabia, the numbers of executions are also very high.

3 0

2 years ago

To what extent do you think the criminal justice system response to the pandemic has had an impact on the provision of public sa

AveGali [126]

The response of the criminal justice system due to the pandemic somehow affects the provision of public safety but stopping the virus from spreading was also important.

<h3>What is the criminal justice system?</h3>

A network of government and commercial institutions tied together to manage crime and control with the help of Academics, law enforcement, and the judiciary is referred to as a criminal justice system.

The criminal justice system has taken risks with public safety but protecting the health of citizens by stopping the spread of the virus was also important.

If the justice system becomes strict during a pandemic then they will face major protests as people were suffering from a lack of necessities and the action of the police will worsen the situation.

Therefore, it affected the pending case of crimes as courts are closed which postponed the decision making.

Learn more about the Criminal Justice system, here:

brainly.com/question/15715106

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago

Which two arguments support loose constructionism?

Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1

2 years ago