The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
What was at stake between the competing candidates, especially Adams and Jackson was the reputation and legality of the United States election system.
We are talking about the controversial US election of 1824.
In this election, four candidates participated: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and William Crawford. The election resulted very competitively, without a clear winner. In the end, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote. That is why the final result relied on the hands of the House of Representatives. Congress gave the final victory to Jhon Quincy Adams, and candidate Jackson accused the decision to be corrupted.
President Adams appointed Henry Clay as his Secretary of State and that made Andrew Jackson accuse this of a corruption action. The popular mane of this situation was known as the Corrupt Bargain.
Start by figuring out is the tenant on a month to month or in the middle of a lease, next is the tenant violating any rules or failing to follow any guidelines? What about behaviour? Is the state lease abiding the state laws? Is the tenant violating laws and or not paying rent on time or just not at all? This is just a few things but if any are met than send out an eviction notice and think about getting an attorney. You will then go to court and you will need witnesses. Then the conviton will be made. Win or lose depending on information. <span />
The migration in the United States in the mid 19th century and the migrations in the present have some similarities and differences.
The Irish immigrants that flooded the United States, migrated because of the potato famine in their country, so people were literary starving and on the verge of existence. The similarity with today's migrations can be see in the massiveness of the migration, especially in Europe, where millions of people are coming from Africa and the Middle East, and it causes big problems.
On the other hand, the Irish had a similar background, and shared pretty much the same values, and the culture and religion were very close with the people in the United States, so the integration into the society was not a problem at all, and everything went smoothly. In Europe, the new migrants are coming from totally different cultural backgrounds, have different values and religion, and languages that are not similar to the one in the hist country. They do not even want to integrate (not all, but the biggest portion of them), and instead of integrating they are actually separating and creating zones where only migrants live and continue to live in the way they did before the migration, and that is causing a big problem. That is a big difference with the Irish migration.
