<span>d. Dependence on troops from conquered regions of the empire
</span>In which of the following governmental factors were the Mughals and Ottomans most similar?
NOT:
a. The goals and objectives of their founders, Babur and Osman
b. In both governments, power was shared by religious and secular leaders
<span>c. Rulers were expected to be capable of military command</span>
The invention of camera obscura took place in the sixteenth century as a means of capturing and fixing images from the natural world.
<h3>What is camera obscura?</h3>
Camera Obscura was a device that was first used to capture images in a dark room and create a visual imprint of the natural world. It was invented by Ibn al-Haytham.
The actual work or utility of the camera obscura was to capture, click as well as fix the discrepancies of the natural world in the images captured.
Hence, the significance of camera obscura is aforementioned. An image of a camera obscura is also attached for better reference.
Learn more about camera obscura here:
brainly.com/question/19117167
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
These were the advantages and disadvantages of joining the Inca empire.
Disadvantages.
You lost just rights as a member of your tribe and surrender yourself to the will of the Inca Emperor.
You had to pay tribute to the Incas.
You depended on the political and economic decisions of the Incas.
Advantages.
You received protection from the common enemies.
You could visit parts of the empire, including Machu Picchu, and benefited from the services of the city.
As part of the powerful Inca Empire, you receive an education.
The Inca had a public education system under the oversight of a government authority.
For the Inca people, education was a priority. And the Inca emperor ordered to have a good education system in the empire. Although in the empire there were social classes, education was for all divided into two: the education designed for the upper classes and the education designed for the Inca people in general.
Japan were not so much unhappy with the outcome of the treaty of Versailles as with how the treaty negotiations took place.
They felt probably correctly that they had been sidelined by the four major powers. However it should be noted that Japan didn't have any role in the European theatre of the war and its contribution was largely confined to providing convoy escorts and attacking Imperial Germany's possessions in the pacific.
For minimal effort during the war Japan was given what had been Germanys pacific Islands together with former territories in China.
The last part was hugely controversial the Germans had seized Shandong from the Chinese and the allies rather than return it to China gave it to Japan.
The Americans as well as some other allies used the venue of Versailles to make criticisms of the rather brutal way that Japan chose to run its empire. At this stage Japan controlled Korea chunks of China as well as various other smaller territories.
The Japanese never attempted to disguise the fact that they viewed other asians as racially inferior. The racial equality motion was merely an attempt to draw equivalence between their empire and the British and French empires.
<span>So at the time the Japanese weren't particuarly displeased at the versailles treaty. In later years it would become tied with the hated Washington naval agreements signed in 1921 which would lead to massive unrest in the Japanese military.</span>
Answer: decentralised powers among the different levels of government within the federal state.
Explanation:
A federal state is one in which there is constitutional division of powers among different levels of government vis -a-vis the federal, state, and local government. It is a government that brings together different group within the federal state. It is also a government that allows each unit to be autonomous and afford them the opportunity to develop at their own pace. This system of government brings government closer to the people and it increases their sense of belonging and participation in the government. It is a kind of government in which it is not possible to amend the constitution in order to satisfy the wish of a few wealthy and influential individuals in the country.
