1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
koban [17]
3 years ago
13

What was the main advantage the Persians had over the Greeks during battle?

History
1 answer:
Tema [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1. it was narrow pass on the massive persian army's front line got smaller as it pushed through. 2. The Greek soldiers had better weapons and armor and were better at hand to hand combat.

You might be interested in
How did imperialism impact the world
pickupchik [31]
Effects of Imperialism - Imperialism is when a mother country takes over a smaller nation or colony for political, social, and/or economic reasons. ... This major Imperialism occurred during the late 19th Century and early 20th century. It had more negativeeffects in the modern world today thenpositive effects.
3 0
2 years ago
If a company makes five dolls and only four sell, there is a
otez555 [7]

Answer:

A. Surplus of dolls

Explanation:

A surplus means that there is extra or too many. If they make 5 and sell only 4, they made too many dolls. Therefore, it is a surplus.

3 0
3 years ago
Who led Persia after overthrowing governments led by France and Britain?
Juli2301 [7.4K]

In the late 1890s, the Foreign Office in London came to regard Germany as the main threat to the European balance of power and British imperial hegemony around the globe. This perceived German threat required a substantial modification of British diplomacy in other parts of the world and was instrumental in the British Foreign Office’s decision to reconsider its policy of rivalry with Russia, despite the Government of India’s continued concern with the Russian threat to the security of British India. Attaining Russia’s friendship became a primary objective of the Conservative British foreign secretary, Lord Lansdowne (1900-5), who initiated the talks for an Anglo-Russian understanding. However, it would be Lansdowne’s Liberal successor, Sir Edward Grey (1905-16), who finally managed to reach a formal accord with Russia in August 1907. By the time of the outbreak of the Persian Constitutional Revolution in 1906, London’s rivalry with Berlin had resulted in the abandonment of the British policy of “Splendid Isolation,” which precluded Britain’s participation in European alliance systems. Britain was now actively pursuing formal friendship with Russia in the European arena of balance of power and attempting to resolve the century-old Anglo-Russian rivalry in Central Asia and Persia. After the outbreak of the Constitutional Revolution in Persia, the British desire for cooperation with Russia placed the Foreign Office in London on a collision course with the Persian nationalist and constitutionalist reformers, many of whom initially looked to Britain for diplomatic assistance in countering overt Russian support for the Persian autocracy. After the conclusion of the 1907 Anglo-Russian Agreement, the British Foreign Office adopted a policy of ample tolerance towards Russian aggression in northern Persia and St. Petersburg’s efforts to obliterate the Persian nationalist/constitutionalist movement, despite periodic objections from the Government of India to London’s policy of appeasing Russian ambitions in Persia.

From 1907 until the outbreak of the First World War, British policy in Persia consisted of extensive cooperation with Russia, to the point of legitimizing Russia’s repeated violations of Persian sovereignty and substantial military presence in northern Persia. In the process, the British Foreign Office abetted Russia in undermining the Persian Constitutional Revolution in December 1911. After the outbreak of the First World War, Britain and Russia abandoned all pretense of respect for Persia’s sovereignty, jointly occupying that country under the pretext of countering German and Ottoman anti-Allied operations in Persia, despite Tehran’s declaration of neutrality in the war. The Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia in 1917 resulted in the cessation of Anglo-Russian friendship in general, and Anglo-Russian military and diplomatic cooperation in Persia in particular. With the withdrawal of Russian forces from Persia, already initiated after the March Revolution in Russia, the subsequent Bolshevik renunciation of the 1907 Agreement, and outbreak of military hostilities between Britain and the Bolshevik government after 1918, Britain attempted to establish its absolute imperial hegemony in Persia: first, through the abortive Anglo-Persian Agreement of 1919, and later by sponsoring the 1921 coup d’etat led by Rezā Khan and Sayyed Żiāʾ-al-Din Ṭabāṭabāʾi.

7 0
3 years ago
How did world war l impact the lives of women in the United States following world war l ?
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

there are two answers, see which one is the suitable one. hope it helps.

Explanation:

1st:

Although neither law took effect until war's end, women took advantage of their husbands' absence to get two bits of legislation made into law: the 18th amendment (which outlawed the sale of liquor) and the 19th Amendment (which gave women the vote in all states). Sometimes you have to take the bad with the good.

2nd:

Tens of thousands of women joined The Women's Land Army to work the soil, fields, and orchards to free men for military service. Women took to the land gladly and brought in the harvest during the war years to supply food to the nation, the military, and our allies

8 0
1 year ago
1. What is the main argument in the excerpt from the Virginia Resolution?
k0ka [10]

1. The main point of the excerpt is that the states are in a contract with the federal government and can cancel or ignore measures used that are in violation of that contract. Essentially the states are allowed to ignore laws, like the Alien and Sedition Acts, when the states believe they violate their rights.

2. Because the Alien and Sedition Acts put a watch on anyone new to the country under the Alien Act and the Sedition Act allowed the government to arrest people if they spoke against the government. These acts allowed the government to violate rights granted under the Constitution.

3. Because accepting the acts would be a violation of the highest laws of the land. It would be the governments willingly violating the rights of the people and allowing the federal government to have power larger than granted to them under the Constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Truman concerned with Communism?
    15·1 answer
  • La droga mata, ensayo argumentativo
    15·1 answer
  • Tell me some stuff about Constantine's military career
    12·1 answer
  • Why didn’t North Korea get to keep the land it temporarily captured in South Korea?
    10·1 answer
  • In what ways did the idea of tradition inform and justify their various calls for separate nationhood?
    11·1 answer
  • Paige lives 3miles east of her school and Diego house is 8 miles west of the school what is thedistance
    10·1 answer
  • Where did the Separatists take their families in 1608?
    6·2 answers
  • A florist has 40 tulips, 32 roses, 60 daises, and 50
    12·1 answer
  • The former soviet union broke into 13121516 separate states.
    7·2 answers
  • ASAP can someone plz help <br><br> facts about shay's Rebellion
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!