Should everyone be permitted to go to college? There are several arguments both for and against this idea. Opponents of this idea claim that there is not enough money to send everyone to college. They also claim that if everyone had the chance to receive a college degree it ould devalue the significance of the degree. As Syndrome from Incredibles ones wisely said,"when everyone's super, no one will be."
However, backers of this idea say that by allowing everyone equal opportunity to go to college it increases the competitive environment that is fostered at these high leveled schools. They believe that a higher education should not be restricted based on wealth. Those supporting free college also refute the idea proposed by the opponents that the college degree will be devalued. They base this rebuttal on the stance that not everyone will achieve a college degree, even if they are given the opportunity. For instance, the type of person who is too lazy to write their own essay and would rather plagiarize the work of others online. Even if by some miracle this person were to make it into college, there is no way that they will ever be able to handle the immense pressures of college-level academics and will likely never be able to obtain a degree.
Answer:
D popularity
Explanation:
This is one of those questions where the answer is inferred. What makes the process so long is never really addressed. But what is said is that the candidates are chosen by the primaries. That means exposure before the actual election takes place.
A: There's nothing about seeking a staff. Not A
B: I can't say why this is wrong. It simply is not the main idea. Responsibility is something all candidates are assumed to have.
C: Another term I'm not sure why it is used. It means awards. It's only indirectly talked about. This paragraph is about the process, not the rewards.
D: The Candidates are looking for the popular vote. They have to be nominated before they can be elected president. That's what the popular vote means.
A.killing miranda and ferdinand first
Answer:
Today there are many types of Protestant Churches. For example, Baptist is currently the largest denomination in the United States but there are many dozens more. How did this happen? Where did they all begin? To understand the Protestant Reform movement, we need to go back in history to the early 16th century when there was only one church in Western Europe - what we would now call the Roman Catholic Church - under the leadership of the Pope in Rome. Today, we call this "Roman Catholic" because there are so many other types of churches (ie Methodist, Baptist, Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican - you get the idea).
Explanation:
Today there are many types of Protestant Churches. For example, Baptist is currently the largest denomination in the United States but there are many dozens more. How did this happen? Where did they all begin? To understand the Protestant Reform movement, we need to go back in history to the early 16th century when there was only one church in Western Europe - what we would now call the Roman Catholic Church - under the leadership of the Pope in Rome. Today, we call this "Roman Catholic" because there are so many other types of churches (ie Methodist, Baptist, Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican - you get the idea).