1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondaur [170]
3 years ago
13

Why were the puritans unhappy with the church of England?

History
1 answer:
jekas [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

they felt that they the church kept too much catholic religion, so they went to the united states looking for a new religion.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Write the Declaration of Independence in your own words
ioda

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance. I can't put the whole thing i have to keep it under 5000 charaters.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of establashing state governments that were republics
Airida [17]
So that there would be government for the people by the people instead of one person forcibly ruling all
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me please I’m dying please help! :(
Flauer [41]

Answer:

True True False

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Overfishing of salmon has caused populations of wild salmon to decline. To combat this decline, salmon are raised in hatcheries,
Tomtit [17]

The differences in the wild and hatcheries make it so the different salmon adapt differently and have different traits.

If salmon are split up into different habitats, one being in the wild and one being in captivity, they will eventually have different adaptations from each other and their offspring will develop traits that are better suited for their environment.

Wild salmon and salmon that are raised in captivity are going to be very different from each other. The salmon in captivity do not have to actively hunt for their food, be wary of certain predators, or may not want to reproduce.

Taking these factors into account, it is very possible that the salmon raised in captivity will have reduced reproductive success compared to the salmon that thrive in the wild. Along with this, they would most likely have many genetic differences from each other and other traits that better adapt to their living situations.

4 0
3 years ago
ASAP please answer both correctly and I will mark brainliest
Lelechka [254]

Answer:

#1 federalists supported & wanted the Constitution to get ratified because they believed the separation of powers between three branches protected the rights of the people.

#2 Antifederalists didnt support &didnt want the Constitution ratified because they believed it failed to protect individual rights and because it gave too much power to national government.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was The Ancient River Civilization of Mesopotamia SOICIAL ​
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone plzzz write 2 paragraphs about Amelia earhart​
    14·1 answer
  • In need of help ASAP!!
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the first African American to receive a PhD in psychology in the United States? Noam Chomsky Francis Cecil Sumner Carl R
    9·2 answers
  • Who are the most important senate officers, and what are their jobs
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    14·2 answers
  • What is an example of a racist claim made by Thomas Jefferson
    13·1 answer
  • How did various groups contribute to the development of New Amsterdam?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the European demonstrate tolerance in their societies​
    6·1 answer
  • 1. What are the different perspectives these sources represent of the scramble for africa? what criticisms of the scramble can y
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!