"Pavlov's dog" experiments with bell ringing as the association, operating on food being served after the bell's chime, involved him measuring the dogs' salivation quantity as a result. It was a study on classical conditioning.
He showed that two things become associated because there is anticipation of reward.
Pretty sure you just call this either a <em>government agency</em> or a building department.
Sorry, the question did not show the options for some reason. it is definately Option D though.
He is BAD. hewas a communist dictator of cuba in 1963. the us and cuba almost went to nuclear war
What that person said ^^^^
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
