1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa86 [58]
3 years ago
6

What might be some of the effects of the confusion surrounding the Iowa vote?

Law
1 answer:
FinnZ [79.3K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

i dont know

Explanation:

You might be interested in
If the offeree can accept the offer with a return promise to perform
kondor19780726 [428]

The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:

If the offeree can accept the offer with a return promise to perform, then the contract is unilateral. True or False?

Answer:

The answer is False.

Explanation:

If the offeror—as opposed to offeree—agrees to make payment to the offeree after the offeree completes a particular act, then the agreement is known as a unilateral contract, or one-sided contract. In a unilateral contract, only the offeror has an obligation to fulfill their part of the agreement.

8 0
3 years ago
Do you believe children that who have been adopted into a different culture should be exposed to and learn the culture and langu
sweet-ann [11.9K]
That’s really up to that person. You don’t have too learn the culture of that person don’t want to really know there parents, if you want to then I recommend it *smiles*
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Over time, the supreme court has been more restrictive in its protection of the right to privacy.
nexus9112 [7]

The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
  • For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.

This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.

More information:

brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults

8 0
3 years ago
The individual rights interpretation of the right to bear arms is supported by the a. the preamble to the Second Amendment. b. t
Darina [25.2K]
The answer is A. The preamble to the second amendment.
4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following types of law protects officers when they search personal property such as a house?
allsm [11]

Answer: C: tort law

Explanation: Because it gives police the right to search peoples homes with or without a warrant

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Celia Tapia (DOB 05/18/1970) experiences issues with repeated urinary tract infections. She is in the office today to provide a
    15·1 answer
  • After learning about some of the duties of a forensic investigator, what do you think would be the most rewarding part of the jo
    12·1 answer
  • Entrepreneurs need to know the basics of accounting even if they hire a professional because
    7·2 answers
  • Can Australian chartered accountant work in USA as a chartered accountant?​
    11·1 answer
  • All jurors have the right to interpret the law as they see fit.<br> O True<br> O False
    5·2 answers
  • In California "common law" crimes
    5·1 answer
  • What is the maximum sentence for Kidnapping with the intention to harm and sexual assault​
    8·2 answers
  • Following color of law prohibits police officers from _____. select all that apply
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an allergic reaction?​
    11·2 answers
  • Someone legally appointed to care for children if their parents die has _____.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!