1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimulka [17.4K]
3 years ago
13

Over time, the supreme court has been more restrictive in its protection of the right to privacy.

Law
1 answer:
nexus9112 [7]3 years ago
8 0

The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
  • For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.

This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.

More information:

brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
QUESTION 8 of 10: What is a focus group?
Talja [164]
A focus group is a research method that brings together a small group of people to answer questions in a moderated setting. The group is chosen due to predefined demographic traits, and the questions are designed to shed light on a topic of interest. Focus groups are a type of qualitative research.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This guy named Jasonclxie is copying my answers, reporting them and having them get deleted, then he is posting MY answer and ge
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

yaassssssssss

Explanation:

We shall riot l.mao

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The security plan of a bank should not include _____.
marshall27 [118]

Answer:

an electronic medical record keeping system

Explanation:

medical records do not belong in a bank

8 0
4 years ago
It is possible for a presidential candidate to lose the popular vote and still win the election through the Electoral College
Ilya [14]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is possible to lose the popular vote and still win the election because the balance of electoral votes is skewed. For example, all the midwest states have little population, but they still have the base 3 points no matter what. If one person gets all the midwest states and the other gets big states, the first one can still win. Richard Nixon is a good example of this happening.

8 0
3 years ago
Should profilers have to possess certain credentials in order to work on cases? Why or why not?
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

why not?

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the role of the Supreme Court in government?
    13·2 answers
  • 9. As governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo has decided he will take the NY National Guard and invade
    7·1 answer
  • Who is d first president of united state ​
    10·2 answers
  • Any task that is useful
    5·1 answer
  • Discuss the reliability of the analytical sciences in the courtroom
    11·1 answer
  • Margot is from Ireland. She has lived
    7·2 answers
  • Your friend wears earbuds while driving to school each day is this safe is it legal why or why not
    9·2 answers
  • What part of copyright allows you to sell a used book, cd, or dvd as you wish?
    6·1 answer
  • Bhearose why are you deleting my science question i have not vailidated any guidlines
    5·1 answer
  • Which United States governing body best reflects the "representative" part of being a representative democracy?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!